Sunday, February 16, 2025

Making First Contact

"Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were, but without it, we go nowhere."  Carl Sagan

I'm a techno freak. I read science fiction and I watch science fiction. One of my producer friends is trying to get the option for one of my favorite science fiction books (hint, hint, Melissa!) Here's a picture of me on the opening day of Guardians of the Galaxy: Cosmic Rewind - at Epcot.


One of my favorite movies is Contact, a 1997 film with Jodie Foster as Dr. Eleanor "Ellie" Arroway, who makes first contact with aliens. Although I love science fiction, I've only written three screenplays that have elements of science fiction. Last Woman is more of a thriller with grounded science fiction.  It is about a young female scientist who suffers from a consuming fear of being alone due to a harrowing assault she endured in college.  When she tests a new device developed by her technology company, a strong electromagnetic pulse transports her to a world free of people and fears. But… she discovers that every time she does -- she grows further and further away from her reality and closer to the man who torments her. Another one of my scripts, Technically Soccer, is about a women's soccer team coached by a droid. Another script, Runaway Cricket  (in production at BlackOrb Studios,) is about a runaway girl befriending an alien. The first two are grounded sci-fi. Is Runaway Cricket grounded? 

What is "grounded sci-fi" and how does this set it apart from other types of science fiction? To really understand grounded sci-fi, it helps to first think about the broader sci-fi genre. Science fiction, at its core, imagines how the future might look based on speculations about technology, science, society and more. It asks "what if?" questions and creatively explores the possibilities. This could mean far-future worlds, alien life, time travel, alternate histories, and other mind-bending concepts.

But grounded sci-fi is a specific approach within this genre. The key word here is "grounded." This type of sci-fi tries to keep at least one foot firmly planted in reality. While it still speculates and imagines future possibilities, it aims to do so in a way that feels authentic and plausible based on what we currently know. Here are some key features that distinguish grounded sci-fi:

 1. Realistic science and technology: In Technically Soccer, droids already exist like AI-Me, (pronounced Amy,) which stands for Artificial Intelligence for Maximizing Efficiencies. Grounded sci-fi usually tries to base its speculative elements on real, cutting-edge science and engineering. The futuristic technologies feel like logical progressions from today's capabilities rather than pure magic or hand-waving. There's an emphasis on scientific accuracy and showing how these advancements might realistically function. 

 2. Relatable settings and characters: The worlds of grounded sci-fi tend to resemble our own, just with added layers of futuristic elements. The societies, cultures, and challenges faced by characters parallel contemporary issues in thought-provoking ways. Basically, despite the sci-fi trappings, this world still feels connected to and shaped by the one we know. Both of my "grounded" scripts take place in the present time and in ordinary settings; a house, an office building, and a soccer field. Runaway Cricket takes place in a small town that could be anywhere - on Earth. It is sort of a modern-day E.T., and if you believe in aliens...

 3. Exploration of near-future scenarios: Rather than leaping centuries or millennia ahead, grounded sci-fi often focuses on the near future, anywhere from a few years to a few decades away. It imagines the impact of emerging technologies, social trends, political changes, environmental challenges, etc., within a timeframe we can still reasonably wrap our minds around. I think the science behind Last Woman exists. An electromagnetic pulse (EMP) is a burst of electromagnetic energy that can disrupt or damage electronic equipment. The physics behind EMPs starts with a rapid acceleration of charged particles, which creates an intense electromagnetic field. This field induces electrical currents in nearby conductors - similar to how a changing magnetic field creates electricity in a generator, but far more intense and sudden. The current military significance of EMPs comes from their ability to disable electronic systems. This is one of the small storylines in my script. When the electromagnetic wave hits electronic equipment, it can induce voltage spikes that exceed what the components are designed to handle. This can burn out semiconductors, damage integrated circuits, and corrupt stored data. Could it make someone appear to "disappear?"

 4. Emphasis on plausibility and consequences: Grounded sci-fi doesn't just focus on the "wow" factor of futuristic concepts. It deeply considers the ripple effects, unintended consequences, and socio-economic implications of these advancements. It aims to tell believable stories of how technology intersects with human experiences, both good and bad. I explore this both in Technically Soccer and Last Woman.

Some well-known examples of grounded sci-fi include:

 - "The Martian" by Andy Weir: A realistic tale of an astronaut stranded on Mars, using real science to solve problems.

- "Minority Report" by Philip Kindred  Dick: A world where "precrime" police use psychics to arrest people before they commit crimes.

The book option that I'd like Melissa to get is similar to Minority Report. One of my favorite movies, is The Martian with Matt Damon, and I started a "Mars-like garden" in my backyard. 

But movies like "Star Wars," are superhero stories, far-future tales, and fantasy-leaning sci-fi wouldn't qualify as "grounded" because they tend to prioritize imagination and drama over realism. The picture above is outside Guardians of the Galaxy in Epcot. That is my favorite franchise of movies. 

 Getting back to Contact - the book vs. the movie, there are five differences I found;

 1. Ellie's childhood and relationship with her father: I write a lot of father/daughter scripts because for the past almost thirty years, I've been close to my father after my mother died. In the book, Ellie's father dies when she is quite young, fueling her interest in science and the stars as a way to feel connected to him. Her childhood, relationship with her father, and early passion for astronomy are explored in much more depth. In contrast, the movie begins with Ellie already grown up. It shows some flashbacks to her as a girl with her father, establishing their bond and her curiosity about the universe. However, this backstory is condensed compared to the book. The film focuses more on Ellie as an adult and her present-day journey.

 2. The nature and motivations of the alien message: The book goes into great scientific and philosophical detail about the alien message, its layers of meaning, and what it suggests about the nature and intentions of the senders. Decoding the message is a major plot point that reveals fascinating insights about the aliens. We don't have the luxury to write a 5-hour movie - unless your last name is Lucus or Coppola. Although a limited series is opening up in this area. The movie streamlines the philosophical, not delving as deeply into the message's complexity. The film is more focused on Ellie's quest to understand and respond to the message rather than its intricate content. The aliens' motivations are left more mysterious and open-ended.

 3. Ellie's romantic relationships: In the book, Ellie has a few romantic partners, including her longtime boyfriend Ken der Heer. Her relationships are realistically complex, influencing her emotions and personal journey throughout the story. Actors cost a lot of money, So the movie reduces this, making Palmer Joss Ellie's primary love interest. Palmer is a Christian philosopher, allowing the film to further highlight the faith vs. science themes. The on-again/off-again nature of their movie romance drives character development and provides conflict that isn't as important in a book.

 4. Ellie's role and the machine: Ellie is part of a large team building the machine in the book based on the alien instructions. She is not the sole passenger, with several international travelers taking the journey alongside her. Compare this to the movie where Ellie is the sole American representative and ends up making the voyage by herself due to sabotage and accidents. Having her go alone heightens the drama and keeps the focus on her individual experience when meeting the aliens.

 5. The meeting with the aliens: The book's alien meeting is an incredibly vivid, almost psychedelic journey through time, space and other dimensions. Ellie has lengthy, enigmatic interactions with the aliens who take on familiar forms from her mind. But In the film, the alien encounter is briefer and less abstract. The aliens appear as fuzzy, incorporeal versions of her deceased father. The dialog is more concise and less philosophical compared to the book. 

 But the best line in the movie isn't even in the book; "The universe is a pretty big place. If it's just us, it seems like an awful waste of space." Carl Sagan wrote this, but he also wrote the first draft of the screenplay. 

 Sagan and his wife, Ann Druyan began working on the movie, Contact in 1979. They wrote a film treatment over 100 pages long and set up the project at Warner Bros. with Peter Guber and Lynda Obst as producers. Nothing happened, so Sagan published Contact as a novel. In 1981, Simon & Schuster gave Sagan a $2 million advance on the novel. At the time, the advance was the largest ever made for a book that had not yet been written. Guess what? The film reentered development in 1989. With Zemeckis as director, filming ran from September 1996 to February 1997. Carl never saw the movie, he died in 1996. 

 Writing a book after the movie is something I'm very familiar with. Last year, I wrote Mama Dallas and Augie (published by Little Studio Publishing. It is based on two screenplays, one of them that I wrote; Augie. I'm hoping to write the third one, which would be the early years of Mama Dallas (Concetta) in Italy.

If we can dream…hey, that is the title of next month's blog!

 

No comments:

Post a Comment